- Focus and Scope
- Section Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Publication Frequency
- Open Access Policy
- Archiving
- Article Processing Charges (APCs) & Article Submission Charges
- Publication Ethic Statement
- Plagiarism Policy
Focus and Scope
Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting ISSN (Online): 2461-0607 and ISSN: 2339-2886 is an open access journal (e-journal) in which intended to enhance quality of knowledge through dissemination of knowledge to academics, practitioners, and all parties who have concern to Accounting, especially related to Auditing, Finance and Forensic Accounting.
Section Policies
Artikel
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Peer Review Process
- Manuscripts sent by the author will go through an initial review process by both Internal and External Editors, especially checking the suitability of "focus and scope", templates, and article plagiarism levels using Turnitin with a maximum Turnitin score limit of 15%. In this process, the editor communicates actively with the author until this article is eligible to be forwarded to the reviewer or returned if the article needs improvement.
- Manuscripts that have passed the initial screening process above will be forwarded or sent to reviewers, both internal and external reviewers, for content review. The review process by reviewers pays attention to novelty, objectivity, methods, scientific impact, conclusions, and references. After review, the reviewer will suggest to the editor to accept, accept with minor revisions, accept with major revisions, or reject the article.
- The editor will decide and consider suggestions from reviewers whether the article is eligible to be accepted or rejected.
- The articles that have been received and have gone through a review process by internal and external reviewers will also be Grammarly tested with a minimum score of 80.
- The review process uses a blind review system. The time limit for the review process is around 3 month, both for reviews by editors and reviews by external reviewers. Likewise, the deadline for revision by the author is around 1 month. The editor's decision is final and independent.
Publication Frequency
Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting is published twice a year in April and October.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Archiving
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More
Article Processing Charges (APCs) & Article Submission Charges
This journal charges the following author fees.
Article Submission FREE: 0.00 (USD)
Article Publication FREE: 0.00 (USD)
Publication Ethic Statement
Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Plagiarism Policy
- Plagiarism and self-plagiarism are not allowed.
- The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
- An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
- Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Plagiarism screening will be conducted by Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting Editorial Board using Turnitin (Maximum Turnitin Score Limit of 15%).
We are using C.O.P.E. flowchart to make an action on plagiarism. (link)